Discussion:
[core] Directing responses to a broker
Benjamin Damm
2017-06-07 23:11:19 UTC
Permalink
Core,

We have a scenario where we want to support CoAP Observes and we also want to optionally flag that responses should not come back to the initiator, but rather go to a broker instead. Have there been any proposals for an extension to indicate this?

Thanks,
-Ben
Christian Amsüss
2017-06-07 23:42:25 UTC
Permalink
Hello Ben,
Post by Benjamin Damm
We have a scenario where we want to support CoAP Observes and we also
want to optionally flag that responses should not come back to the
initiator, but rather go to a broker instead. Have there been any
proposals for an extension to indicate this?
This sounds a lot like what Zhen Cao has suggested in
[delegated-observe].

I think such a setup -- if you indeed think what Zhen wrote -- is too
brittle to be practical, and [suggested] alternatives I'd consider more
reliable. The discussion on delegated-observe became quiet, but please
have a look and let's continue it.

Best regards
Christian

[delegated-observe]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cao-core-delegated-observe-00
[suggested]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/sSRxmiXgfHrnDbrKRyvnQ5QIJCo
--
Christian Amsüss | Energy Harvesting Solutions GmbH
founder, system architect | headquarter:
mailto:***@energyharvesting.at | Arbeitergasse 15, A-4400 Steyr
tel:+43-664-97-90-6-39 | http://www.energyharvesting.at/
| ATU68476614
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...