[core] CoRE@IETF98

[Carsten Bormann]

We have uploaded a 0.1 draft of the CoRE agenda for Chicago at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/core/

As usual, this is based on the documents we have on the plate.

If you have a document, please check the above agenda that you have adequate time at this meeting to drive your work forward. Please tell us who will be managing the slot.
(And start making slides… We’ll want them on Saturday, March 25.)

Anything else that should be on the agenda?

(Note that we are a bit constrained with allocating time, as we asked for 180 minutes total only for CoRE. So there is no flextime this time, just a little bit of buffer on Friday for spillover from Tuesday.)

Grüße, Carsten

[Christian Groves]

Hello Carsten,

Given that draft-ietf-core-interfaces, draft-ietf-core-dynlink,
draft-groves-core-obsattr and draft-groves-core-bas are all related it
may be more efficient to present them as a block?

I was also going to propose to discuss about the renaming of the "lt"
parameter so I don't know if we should do that in conjunction with
draft-ietf-core-resource-directory? It might take some time. There's
also the proposal on the list regarding updating RD to make the IANA
registration of query attributes more generic.

With respect to draft-groves-core-rfc6690up I haven't done anything more
on this so if you need more time it would be OK to drop it. However I'm
happy to discuss it with people in Chicago.

Yes draft-groves-coap-webrtcdc is not dead. My understanding from Seoul
was that we'd hold off on it until draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls was out
of the way.

Regards, Christian

Post by Carsten Bormann
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/core/
As usual, this is based on the documents we have on the plate.
If you have a document, please check the above agenda that you have adequate time at this meeting to drive your work forward. Please tell us who will be managing the slot.
(And start making slides… We’ll want them on Saturday, March 25.)
Anything else that should be on the agenda?
(Note that we are a bit constrained with allocating time, as we asked for 180 minutes total only for CoRE. So there is no flextime this time, just a little bit of buffer on Friday for spillover from Tuesday.)
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core

[peter van der Stok]

Hi Carsten,

I will be happy to present ietf-comi-00 draft; It needs some discussion
on the content-format for the PATCH and FETCH methods. I like to hear
the opinion of the WG

For the hartke-core-pending draft I should like a 2 min elevator pitch
at the start of the Friday meeting, followed by a 2 minute request for
interest.

Greetings,

peter

Post by Carsten Bormann
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/core/
As usual, this is based on the documents we have on the plate.
If you have a document, please check the above agenda that you have
adequate time at this meeting to drive your work forward. Please tell
us who will be managing the slot.
(And start making slides… We’ll want them on Saturday, March 25.)
Anything else that should be on the agenda?
(Note that we are a bit constrained with allocating time, as we asked
for 180 minutes total only for CoRE. So there is no flextime this
time, just a little bit of buffer on Friday for spillover from
Tuesday.)
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core

[Jaime Jiménez]

Hi all,

just a gentle reminder to the document authors about the IETF 98 agenda.

If you have not already, please let the chairs know if you can present the draft updates in the allocated slot or not, so that we can reschedule.

Those still missing, will receive an individual reminder before the end of the week :)

Thanks!

--------------- 8< ------------------
PRELIMINARY AGENDA IETF 98

TUESDAY, March 28, 2017
1300–1430 Afternoon Session I: Zurich C

Intro (10)

* Agenda bashing, WG status
* Mention RFC 8075, draft-ietf-core-etch<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-etch>

Post-WGLC (15)

* (brief update) draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls> –07 2017–03–06
* (results of 2nd WGLC) draft-ietf-core-links-json<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-links-json> –07 2017–03–13

Maybe WGLC (15)

* (new appendix, WGLC now?) draft-ietf-core-cocoa<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-cocoa> –01 2017–03–13
* (call for review) draft-ietf-core-resource-directory<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-resource-directory> –10 2017–03–13

comi (20)

* Discuss results from Monday’s 15:20 to 16:50 semi-formal COMI meeting

Objective: Which of these can we WGLC now? Where are we with installing a SID process with IANA and other actors needed? [SID] Check status of IANA processes (register SIDs, lookup SIDs).

* draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor> –04 2017–02–07
* draft-ietf-core-comi<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-comi> –00 2017–01–26
* draft-ietf-core-sid<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-sid> –00 2016–10–26

Objective: what are the next steps? (Based on results from Monday:)

* draft-veillette-core-yang-library<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-veillette-core-yang-library> –00 2017–01–31

object security (30)

* Report of the Interop (Summary)
* Updates on the bigger changes on v –02
* Confirm results of inner-blockwise discussion, cf. http-encryption
* Objective: ➔ more interops + WGLC before or right after Prague.
* draft-ietf-core-object-security<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-object-security> –02 2017–03–13

What does the WG want to do with (the subjects of) these documents:

* draft-hartke-core-e2e-security-reqs<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hartke-core-e2e-security-reqs> –02 2017–01–06
* draft-mattsson-core-security-overhead<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mattsson-core-security-overhead> –00 2017–03–13
* draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap> –01 2017–03–13

Σ 90



FRIDAY, March 31, 2017
1150–1320 Afternoon Session I: Zurich C
Intro (5)
spillover from Tuesday (20)
data formats (20)
Objective: is this now finally ready for WGLC?

* draft-ietf-core-senml<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-senml> –05 2017–03–13

Objective: Should these be worked on by the CoRE WG?

* draft-groves-core-senml-bto<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-groves-core-senml-bto> –00 2016–10–17
* draft-groves-core-senml-options<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-groves-core-senml-options> –00 2017–03–10

Working on it (15)

* (just call for review) draft-ietf-core-coap-pubsub<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-pubsub> –01 2017–03–13
* draft-ietf-core-interfaces<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-interfaces> –09 2017–03–13
* draft-ietf-core-dynlink<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-dynlink> –03 2017–03–13

Transports: candidates for WG work (10)

* (get reviews) draft-becker-core-coap-sms-gprs<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-becker-core-coap-sms-gprs> –06 2017–02–20

Objective: discuss this in the context of the now completed coap-tcp

* draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation> –04 2016–10–31

More open discussion: (20)
(Gong show)

* draft-cao-core-delegated-observe<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cao-core-delegated-observe> –00 2016–10–27
* draft-groves-core-obsattr<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-groves-core-obsattr> –00 2017–02–21
* draft-groves-core-bas<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-groves-core-bas> –01 2017–03–13
* draft-groves-core-rfc6690up<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-groves-core-rfc6690up> –00 2016–10–17
* draft-hartke-core-pending<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hartke-core-pending> –00 2017–02–27

Σ 90



Ciao!
- - Jaime Jiménez

On 15 Mar 2017, at 21.50, Carsten Bormann <***@tzi.org<mailto:***@tzi.org>> wrote:

We have uploaded a 0.1 draft of the CoRE agenda for Chicago at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/core/

As usual, this is based on the documents we have on the plate.

If you have a document, please check the above agenda that you have adequate time at this meeting to drive your work forward. Please tell us who will be managing the slot.
(And start making slides
 We’ll want them on Saturday, March 25.)

Anything else that should be on the agenda?

(Note that we are a bit constrained with allocating time, as we asked for 180 minutes total only for CoRE. So there is no flextime this time, just a little bit of buffer on Friday for spillover from Tuesday.)

GrÌße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
core mailing list
***@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core

[Carsten Bormann]

A consolidated slide deck is now available at

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-98-core-consolidated-slide-set/

Slot leaders: Please check your slides are in (in the newest version you sent me).

See you 6600 seconds...

Grüße, Carsten

[Carsten Bormann]

Post by Carsten Bormann
A consolidated slide deck is now available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-98-core-consolidated-slide-set/

Updated now for today’s meeting.
(Slot leaders: Please check.)

(We're still waiting for the SID/IANA slides.)

Grüße, Carsten