Discussion:
[core] SenML and its use in core-interfaces (follow-up on bn/n URI clarification)
Christian Amsüss
2017-05-02 10:45:29 UTC
Permalink
Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
senml ?
OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
formats could even merge.

With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
work fine for me.

Best regards
Christian
--
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
-- Bene Gesserit axiom
Ari Keränen
2017-05-03 21:19:01 UTC
Permalink
Hi Christian,

Thanks for the update! If we want to have a call it should probably be US-friendly too, so late evening in Europe time zones. I'd suggest 16:00 CEST (7 AM PST) on 9th of May.


Cheers,
Ari
Post by Christian Amsüss
Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
senml ?
OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
formats could even merge.
With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
work fine for me.
Best regards
Christian
--
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
-- Bene Gesserit axiom
Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
2017-05-04 02:29:43 UTC
Permalink
OK, this sounds like a good path forward. I am still interests in learing more about the issue and how we might solve it.

16:00 CEST is a good time for me generally but unfortunately on may 9 I will be flying. I could do May 5, or 10.
Post by Ari Keränen
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the update! If we want to have a call it should probably be US-friendly too, so late evening in Europe time zones. I'd suggest 16:00 CEST (7 AM PST) on 9th of May.
Cheers,
Ari
Post by Christian Amsüss
Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
senml ?
OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
formats could even merge.
With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
work fine for me.
Best regards
Christian
--
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
-- Bene Gesserit axiom
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
2017-05-04 02:32:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
OK, this sounds like a good path forward. I am still interests in learing more about the issue and how we might solve it.
16:00 CEST is a good time for me generally but unfortunately on may 9 I will be flying. I could do May 5, or 10.
Oops I sent that too soon. Turns out I can not do the 10th but I can do the 11th.
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Post by Ari Keränen
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the update! If we want to have a call it should probably be US-friendly too, so late evening in Europe time zones. I'd suggest 16:00 CEST (7 AM PST) on 9th of May.
Cheers,
Ari
Post by Christian Amsüss
Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
senml ?
OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
formats could even merge.
With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
work fine for me.
Best regards
Christian
--
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
-- Bene Gesserit axiom
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
Ari Keränen
2017-05-04 20:00:31 UTC
Permalink
The 11th 16:00 CET works for me. If anyone else wants to join, please let us know.

Cheers,
Ari
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
OK, this sounds like a good path forward. I am still interests in learing more about the issue and how we might solve it.
16:00 CEST is a good time for me generally but unfortunately on may 9 I will be flying. I could do May 5, or 10.
Oops I sent that too soon. Turns out I can not do the 10th but I can do the 11th.
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Post by Ari Keränen
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the update! If we want to have a call it should probably be US-friendly too, so late evening in Europe time zones. I'd suggest 16:00 CEST (7 AM PST) on 9th of May.
Cheers,
Ari
Post by Christian Amsüss
Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
senml ?
OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
formats could even merge.
With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
work fine for me.
Best regards
Christian
--
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
-- Bene Gesserit axiom
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
Michael Koster
2017-05-05 07:47:56 UTC
Permalink
Yes, I'd like to join the call

Best regards,

Michael
Post by Ari Keränen
The 11th 16:00 CET works for me. If anyone else wants to join, please let us know.
Cheers,
Ari
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
OK, this sounds like a good path forward. I am still interests in learing more about the issue and how we might solve it.
16:00 CEST is a good time for me generally but unfortunately on may 9 I will be flying. I could do May 5, or 10.
Oops I sent that too soon. Turns out I can not do the 10th but I can do the 11th.
Post by Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Post by Ari Keränen
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the update! If we want to have a call it should probably be US-friendly too, so late evening in Europe time zones. I'd suggest 16:00 CEST (7 AM PST) on 9th of May.
Cheers,
Ari
Post by Christian Amsüss
Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
senml ?
OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
formats could even merge.
With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
work fine for me.
Best regards
Christian
--
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
-- Bene Gesserit axiom
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
_______________________________________________
core mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
Loading...